From me at the-compiler.org Thu Jul 14 17:11:04 2016 From: me at the-compiler.org (Florian Bruhin) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:11:04 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] Config corruptions Message-ID: <20160714151104.udot5fo7y2tgetbt@tonks> Hi, I just fixed a bug which resets some config values to the default when your config contains an option which was removed in qutebrowser. On Monday/Tuesday I removed two options, which triggered this bug. If you're using a release or -git before Monday, this shouldn't affect you unless you're updating from a version from October 2015 (v0.4.1) or older. If you pulled since Monday and didn't run qutebrowser yet, please pull again before running it. If you pulled and did run qutebrowser since then, some options in your config were likely reset to their defaults. Sorry about that! :( Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From q09yyd4t1ph7a1 at gmail.com Wed Jul 20 10:44:24 2016 From: q09yyd4t1ph7a1 at gmail.com (Ernesto Gabriel) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 04:44:24 -0400 Subject: [qutebrowser] how do disable menu on bottom left (picture attached) Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2016-07-20-044115_1920x1080_scrot.png Type: image/png Size: 1075134 bytes Desc: not available URL: From me at the-compiler.org Wed Jul 20 10:55:57 2016 From: me at the-compiler.org (Florian Bruhin) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:55:57 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] how do disable menu on bottom left (picture attached) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20160720085557.7dnemb6zs2k6t2hj@tonks> Hi, :set ui keyhint-blacklist * Also, http://email.is-not-s.ms/ ;) Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From me at the-compiler.org Mon Jul 25 18:31:03 2016 From: me at the-compiler.org (Florian Bruhin) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:31:03 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? Message-ID: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> Hi, I got contacted by the Ecosia search engine a few days ago: https://www.ecosia.org/ They seem to get their results via Bing mostly (DuckDuckGo gets them from Yahoo and in some regions Yandex/Bing) and apparently use (part of) their ad income to plant trees: https://info.ecosia.org/what I was asked whether I was interested in using it as a default search engine for qutebrowser (instead of duckduckgo), and I'd get half of the ad income generated by qutebrowser searches in return. They claim this is about 2000 EUR per month for a partner of similar size - though I'm currently asking for clarification as I'm not sure their predictions about qutebrowser users are accurate ;) I'd like to hear some more opinions about this - if there's really some four-figure income associated with this I could probably continue working part-time on qutebrowser after my study (i.e. in about three years) which would be a nice thing and help qutebrowser a lot. On the other hand, while Ecosia seems quite cool, it seems to lack some functionality (like instant answers) compared to duckduckgo. What do you think? Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From riepernet at fsfe.org Mon Jul 25 18:45:39 2016 From: riepernet at fsfe.org (Thomas Jensch) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:45:39 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? In-Reply-To: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> References: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> Message-ID: <20160725164539.s3ol2vvonicafvun@serenity.riepernet.org> hiho, * Florian Bruhin [2016-07-25T18:31+0200]: > What do you think? surfraw user here - unfortunately for you, I dont utilize any preset search engine in any browsers I use. sorry. mfg Thomas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 299 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From catwheezel at operamail.com Mon Jul 25 19:02:44 2016 From: catwheezel at operamail.com (Whiskers) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:02:44 +0100 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? In-Reply-To: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> References: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> Message-ID: <20160725180244.6b001723.catwheezel@operamail.com> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:31:03 +0200 Florian Bruhin wrote: >Hi, > >I got contacted by the Ecosia search engine a few days ago: >https://www.ecosia.org/ > >They seem to get their results via Bing mostly (DuckDuckGo gets them >from Yahoo and in some regions Yandex/Bing) and apparently use (part >of) their ad income to plant trees: >https://info.ecosia.org/what [...] >On the other hand, while Ecosia seems quite cool, it seems to lack >some functionality (like instant answers) compared to duckduckgo. > >What do you think? > >Florian I generally prefer 'Ixquick' (now calling itself 'StartPage' as well) which apparently gets it's search results from Google. But I'm all in favour of variety and I'd give 'Ecosia' a go if it might help qutebrowser. I do like trees :)) -- -- ^^^^^^^^^^ -- Whiskers -- ~~~~~~~~~~ From tuck3r53 at gmail.com Mon Jul 25 19:15:24 2016 From: tuck3r53 at gmail.com (Jasper Campbell) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:15:24 -0400 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? In-Reply-To: <20160725180244.6b001723.catwheezel@operamail.com> References: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> <20160725180244.6b001723.catwheezel@operamail.com> Message-ID: Personally I like DDG. I think that venturing out into other search engines can be a slippery slope, but if it does bring in monthly money, that is just hard or impossible to turn down, as long as the company has users in it's best interest. Would be interesting to know what data they are collecting and who they are selling it to. --- Jasper C. [He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. - Jim Elliott] [There are three stages to every great work of God; first it is impossible, then it is difficult, then it is done - Hudson Taylor] On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Whiskers wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:31:03 +0200 Florian Bruhin > wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I got contacted by the Ecosia search engine a few days ago: > >https://www.ecosia.org/ > > > >They seem to get their results via Bing mostly (DuckDuckGo gets them > >from Yahoo and in some regions Yandex/Bing) and apparently use (part > >of) their ad income to plant trees: > >https://info.ecosia.org/what > > [...] > > >On the other hand, while Ecosia seems quite cool, it seems to lack > >some functionality (like instant answers) compared to duckduckgo. > > > >What do you think? > > > >Florian > > I generally prefer 'Ixquick' (now calling itself 'StartPage' as well) > which apparently gets it's search results from Google. > > But I'm all in favour of variety and I'd give 'Ecosia' a go if it might > help qutebrowser. I do like trees :)) > > -- > -- ^^^^^^^^^^ > -- Whiskers > -- ~~~~~~~~~~ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mgkeyes at vigovproductions.net Mon Jul 25 21:21:47 2016 From: mgkeyes at vigovproductions.net (Michael Keyes) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:21:47 +0100 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? In-Reply-To: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> References: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> Message-ID: <3437f0df-e8d0-e978-7c64-0797ed851091@vigovproductions.net> On 25.07.16 17:31, Florian Bruhin wrote: > What do you think? > > Florian > Well, I'm always willing to try something new. I do like the sound of trees, but unfortunately that "what" link is giving a server error right now! Still sounds like it might be a good idea. -- Michael PGP/GPG Key: https://www.vigovproductions.net/pubkey.asc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From blm at zedat.fu-berlin.de Tue Jul 26 11:19:19 2016 From: blm at zedat.fu-berlin.de (Brent Moran) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:19:19 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? In-Reply-To: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> References: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> Message-ID: <20160726091919.GA9202@linuxinc.localdomain> Set any defaults you like; your user base is plenty competent to change them (and will probably stay that way, given the nature of the browser :) ). Of course, that may mean the income from setting such a default will be severely diminished. I guess if no one uses it, you can always change it back (or to something else) later. Brent On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:31:03PM +0200, Florian Bruhin wrote: > Hi, > > I got contacted by the Ecosia search engine a few days ago: > https://www.ecosia.org/ > > They seem to get their results via Bing mostly (DuckDuckGo gets them > from Yahoo and in some regions Yandex/Bing) and apparently use (part > of) their ad income to plant trees: > https://info.ecosia.org/what > > I was asked whether I was interested in using it as a default search > engine for qutebrowser (instead of duckduckgo), and I'd get half of > the ad income generated by qutebrowser searches in return. They claim > this is about 2000 EUR per month for a partner of similar size - > though I'm currently asking for clarification as I'm not sure their > predictions about qutebrowser users are accurate ;) > > I'd like to hear some more opinions about this - if there's really > some four-figure income associated with this I could probably continue > working part-time on qutebrowser after my study (i.e. in about three > years) which would be a nice thing and help qutebrowser a lot. > > On the other hand, while Ecosia seems quite cool, it seems to lack > some functionality (like instant answers) compared to duckduckgo. > > What do you think? > > Florian > > -- > http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) > GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc > I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ From me at the-compiler.org Tue Jul 26 14:23:28 2016 From: me at the-compiler.org (Florian Bruhin) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:23:28 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser v0.8.0 released! Message-ID: <20160726122328.ugzm6g74nqrz2pfv@tonks> Hi, I'm happy to annouce the release of qutebrowser v0.8.0! The main reason for this release is that v0.7.0 will break with PyQt 5.7 which is soon going to be released. I decided to do a new minor release instead of a patch release as plenty new features have accumulated already. If your distribution can't update to v0.8.0 for some reason, backporting the following patch *should* work, though I haven't verified this: https://github.com/The-Compiler/qutebrowser/commit/63e466f01985abd7be275855f0af7450eb97d8e1 This release also got a big refactoring to prepare for QtWebEngine support. To my current knowledge, all issues have been smoothened out. If not, crash reports shall now tell me. ;) You can also already start with "--backend webengine" with this release to try the QtWebEngine support - however many features are still missing. Source release and binaries for Windows/OS X are available, the Debian packages are still work-in-progress. The full changelog for this release: Added ~~~~~ - New `:repeat-command` command (mapped to `.`) to repeat the last command. Note that two former default bundings conflict with that binding, unbinding them via `:unbind .i` and `:unbind .o` is recommended. - New `qute:bookmarks` page which displays all bookmarks and quickmarks. - New `:prompt-open-download` (bound to `Ctrl-X`) which can be used to open a download directly when getting the filename prompt. - New `{host}` replacement for tab- and window titles which evaluates to the current host. - New default binding `;t` for `:hint input`. - New variables `$QUTE_CONFIG_DIR`, `$QUTE_DATA_DIR` and `$QUTE_DOWNLOAD_DIR` available for userscripts. - New option `ui` -> `status-position` to configure the position of the status bar (top/bottom). - New `--pdf ` argument for `:print` which can be used to generate a PDF without a dialog. Changed ~~~~~~~ - `:scroll-perc` now prefers a count over the argument given to it, which means `gg` can be used with a count. - Aliases can now use `;;` to have an alias which executed multiple commands. - `:edit-url` now does nothing if the URL isn't changed in the spawned editor. - `:bookmark-add` can now be passed a URL and title to add that as a bookmark rather than the current page. - New `taskadd` userscript to add a taskwarrior task annotated with the current URL. - `:bookmark-del` and `:quickmark-del` now delete the current page's URL if none is given. Fixed ----- - Compatibility with PyQt 5.7 - Fixed some configuration values being lost when a config option gets removed from qutebrowser's code. - Fix crash when downloading with a full disk - Using `:jump-mark` (e.g. `''`) when the current URL is invalid doesn't crash anymore. Removed ------- - The ability to display status messages from webpages, as well as the related `ui -> display-statusbar-messages` setting. - The `general -> wrap-search` setting as searches now always wrap. According to a quick straw poll and prior crash logs, almost nobody is using `wrap-search = false`, and turning off wrapping is not possible with QtWebEngine. - `:edit-url` now doesn't accept a count anymore as its behavior was confusing and it doesn't make much sense to add a count. Since v0.7.0, the following people have contributed to qutebrowser: - Ryan Roden-Corrent - Jan Verbeek - Daniel Schadt - Marshall Lochbaum - Ismail S - David Vogt - Micha? G?ral - Panashe M. Fundira - Jeremy Kaplan - Edgar Hipp - Daryl Finlay - Jean-Louis Fuchs - Kevin Velghe - Jakub Klinkovsk? - Dietrich Daroch Thank you! Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From me at the-compiler.org Tue Jul 26 17:10:01 2016 From: me at the-compiler.org (Florian Bruhin) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:10:01 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser v0.8.0 released! In-Reply-To: <20160726122328.ugzm6g74nqrz2pfv@tonks> References: <20160726122328.ugzm6g74nqrz2pfv@tonks> Message-ID: <20160726151001.ogeeowp4oy5g55bx@tonks> * Florian Bruhin [2016-07-26 14:23:28 +0200]: > Source release and binaries for Windows/OS X are available, the Debian > packages are still work-in-progress. Debian packages are uploaded in the meantime. The .dmg unfortunately was broken and qutebrowser wouldn't start at all. I now uploaded a fixed qutebrowser-0.8.0-2.dmg and added a smoke test to the packaging script so this shouldn't happen again. Sorry! Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ben.hengst at gmail.com Tue Jul 26 17:35:15 2016 From: ben.hengst at gmail.com (benh) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:35:15 +0000 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? In-Reply-To: <20160726091919.GA9202@linuxinc.localdomain> References: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> <20160726091919.GA9202@linuxinc.localdomain> Message-ID: +1 for set default to what ever Florian wants and we can change as needed On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:21 AM Brent Moran wrote: > Set any defaults you like; your user base is plenty competent to change > them (and will probably stay that way, given the nature of the browser > :) ). Of course, that may mean the income from setting such a default > will be severely diminished. I guess if no one uses it, you can always > change it back (or to something else) later. > > Brent > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:31:03PM +0200, Florian Bruhin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I got contacted by the Ecosia search engine a few days ago: > > https://www.ecosia.org/ > > > > They seem to get their results via Bing mostly (DuckDuckGo gets them > > from Yahoo and in some regions Yandex/Bing) and apparently use (part > > of) their ad income to plant trees: > > https://info.ecosia.org/what > > > > I was asked whether I was interested in using it as a default search > > engine for qutebrowser (instead of duckduckgo), and I'd get half of > > the ad income generated by qutebrowser searches in return. They claim > > this is about 2000 EUR per month for a partner of similar size - > > though I'm currently asking for clarification as I'm not sure their > > predictions about qutebrowser users are accurate ;) > > > > I'd like to hear some more opinions about this - if there's really > > some four-figure income associated with this I could probably continue > > working part-time on qutebrowser after my study (i.e. in about three > > years) which would be a nice thing and help qutebrowser a lot. > > > > On the other hand, while Ecosia seems quite cool, it seems to lack > > some functionality (like instant answers) compared to duckduckgo. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Florian > > > > -- > > http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) > > GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc > > I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ > > > -- #stay-awesome -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mattator at gmail.com Tue Jul 26 17:46:46 2016 From: mattator at gmail.com (Matt) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:46:46 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser search partnership with Ecosia? In-Reply-To: References: <20160725163103.4fzggsdcfaioittq@tonks> <20160726091919.GA9202@linuxinc.localdomain> Message-ID: I count among those who are happy to see money in opensource projects. It might raise tricky governance problem at times but in this case it seems ok. I suppose some of the money (5-25% depending on qutebrowser coding workload is handled) could be redistributed as bug bounties so that other regular contributors can benefit from it. 2016-07-26 17:35 GMT+02:00 benh : > +1 for set default to what ever Florian wants and we can change as needed > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:21 AM Brent Moran wrote: >> >> Set any defaults you like; your user base is plenty competent to change >> them (and will probably stay that way, given the nature of the browser >> :) ). Of course, that may mean the income from setting such a default >> will be severely diminished. I guess if no one uses it, you can always >> change it back (or to something else) later. >> >> Brent >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:31:03PM +0200, Florian Bruhin wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I got contacted by the Ecosia search engine a few days ago: >> > https://www.ecosia.org/ >> > >> > They seem to get their results via Bing mostly (DuckDuckGo gets them >> > from Yahoo and in some regions Yandex/Bing) and apparently use (part >> > of) their ad income to plant trees: >> > https://info.ecosia.org/what >> > >> > I was asked whether I was interested in using it as a default search >> > engine for qutebrowser (instead of duckduckgo), and I'd get half of >> > the ad income generated by qutebrowser searches in return. They claim >> > this is about 2000 EUR per month for a partner of similar size - >> > though I'm currently asking for clarification as I'm not sure their >> > predictions about qutebrowser users are accurate ;) >> > >> > I'd like to hear some more opinions about this - if there's really >> > some four-figure income associated with this I could probably continue >> > working part-time on qutebrowser after my study (i.e. in about three >> > years) which would be a nice thing and help qutebrowser a lot. >> > >> > On the other hand, while Ecosia seems quite cool, it seems to lack >> > some functionality (like instant answers) compared to duckduckgo. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > Florian >> > >> > -- >> > http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) >> > GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc >> > I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ >> >> > -- > > #stay-awesome From me at the-compiler.org Wed Jul 27 12:57:30 2016 From: me at the-compiler.org (Florian Bruhin) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:57:30 +0200 Subject: [qutebrowser] qutebrowser v0.8.1 released! Message-ID: <20160727105730.lnyae4kjmq2th7ul@tonks> Hi, I'm (not-so-)happy to annouce the release of qutebrowser v0.8.1! Due to a change in v0.8.0 how command aliases are handled, doing ":" without a command crashed. For some reason, nobody found this one before the release, but since the release yesterday I already got 4 crash reports for it :D I also found out that "--backend webengine" is currently not working in the OS X .app. I clarified that in the error message and opened an issue, as it looks non-trivial to fix. Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: From q09yyd4t1ph7a1 at gmail.com Fri Jul 29 22:19:41 2016 From: q09yyd4t1ph7a1 at gmail.com (Ernesto Gabriel) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:19:41 -0400 Subject: [qutebrowser] Help me change Control-W behavior. Message-ID: hey dev, Before the latest update, pressing Control-W when there was prompt in the statusbar deleted everything back to a slash or space. Now, it deletes everything back to the space, and it's annoying because when it prompts "save file to", it deletes the entire suggested path and requires me to type in the path again. How can I revert this behavior? sincerely, a fan of qutebrowser. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ryan at rcorre.net Sat Jul 30 04:05:00 2016 From: ryan at rcorre.net (Ryan Roden-Corrent) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 22:05:00 -0400 Subject: [qutebrowser] Help me change Control-W behavior. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20160730020500.GA518@zen-arch> This PR [https://github.com/The-Compiler/qutebrowser/pull/1592] changed the behavior to match readline's unix-word-rubout. What you're looking for is what readline calls 'unix-filename-rubout'. You can press ctrl-backspace for this behavior, but it can't be rebound. I've filed an issue for this, as I find it useful as well: https://github.com/The-Compiler/qutebrowser/issues/1710. On Fri 07/29/16 04:19PM, Ernesto Gabriel wrote: > hey dev, > > Before the latest update, pressing Control-W when there was prompt in the > statusbar deleted everything back to a slash or space. > Now, it deletes everything back to the space, and it's annoying because > when it prompts "save file to", it deletes the entire suggested path and > requires me to type in the path again. > How can I revert this behavior? > > sincerely, > > a fan of qutebrowser.