ram

[Florian Bruhin]

Hey,

* Ibon Santisteban <OBIBON at gmx.com> [2016-03-02 20:48:13 +0100]:
> The websites that I​ had open were:
>  
> lxer.com
> elcorreo.com
> argia.eus
> hoechberg.de
> primewire.ag (the main website; I wasn't streaming anything yet)
>  
> To meassure I used ps_mem; a package from the Manjaro repositories.
> I could try other methods, but besides htop and conky I don't know
> how. Conky's overall RAM usage matched the one I got with ps_mem,
> but I don't have configured so that you can see the processes and
> how much they are using. I could do that for testing though, if it
> were of any help...

I tried to reproduce this, with a freshly opened instance, and
measuring qutebrowser's RAM usage after all pages were loaded.
I get 310 MB (rather than your 588 MiB), and 318 MB with Otter.

I'm wondering, does it look the same for you when you launch with
--temp-basedir?

Florian

-- 
http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP)
   GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
         I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/qutebrowser/attachments/20160302/b7054e71/attachment.asc>